PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Max Cleland Over-the-Road Bus Security and Safety Act of 2003

Held at the desk.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Jul 30, 2003

(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on 07/16/03. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Max Cleland Over-the-Road Bus Security and Safety Act of 2003 - (Sec. 2) Authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), to make grants to private operators of over-the-road buses for specified system-wide security improvements to their operations, including the reimbursement of extraordinary security-related costs incurred since September 11, 2001. Sets the Federal share of cost for such grants at 90 percent.

(Sec. 3) Requires: (1) an applicant private operator of over-the-road buses to submit to the Secretary a security improvements plan; and (2) an applicant for a grant for security improvements within a terminal owned and operated by an entity other than the applicant to demonstrate to the Secretary that the applicant has coordinated such improvements for the terminal with the entity.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

(Sec. 4) Defines "over-the-road bus" as a bus characterized by an elevated passenger deck located over a baggage compartment.

(Sec. 5) Requires the Secretary to submit to specified congressional committees a preliminary report that includes an assessment of the over-the-road bus security grant program.

(Sec. 6) Authorizes appropriations for FY 2003 and 2004.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
8 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Held at the desk.

  2. Received in the House.

  3. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  4. Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR 7/31/2003 S10449-10451; text of measure as reported: CR 7/31/2003 S10449-110450; text of measure as passed Senate: CR 7/31/2003 S10450-10451)

  5. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR 7/31/2003 S10449-10451; text of measure as reported: CR 7/31/2003 S10449-110450; text of measure as passed Senate: CR 7/31/2003 S10450-10451)

  6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 210.

  7. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator McCain with amendments. With written report No. 108-104.

  8. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator McCain with amendments. With written report No. 108-104.

  9. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text of measure as introduced: CR S5436)

  11. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5435-5436)

  12. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.929 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.929 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.929 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.929 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources