(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on July 30, 2003. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Federal Employee Student Loan Assistance Act - Increases the annual and aggregate limits ($10,000 and $60,000, respectively) on the amount of an employee's student loan an agency may repay.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9835)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9835)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 926.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9835-9836)
Mrs. Davis, Jo Ann moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Civil Service and Agency Organization.
Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.
Received in the House.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR 7/31/2003 S10451; text as passed Senate: CR 7/31/2003 S10451)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR 7/31/2003 S10451; text as passed Senate: CR 7/31/2003 S10451)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 220.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. With written report No. 108-109. Additional views filed.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Collins without amendment. With written report No. 108-109. Additional views filed.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee on Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S5435)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.926 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.926 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.926 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.926 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.