PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S6094-6095)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 16, 1997
Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act to establish a prospective payment system (PPS) for skilled nursing facility (SNF) services, based on per diem rates set by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, updated annually and adjusted for case mix and geographic variations in labor costs. Provides a four-year transition period for shifting the calculation of such rates from facility-specific historic data to average national or regional costs. Directs the Secretary to establish a SNF market basket index reflecting changes over time in the prices of an appropriate mix of goods and services. Requires SNFs to provide the Secretary with the resident assessment data necessary to develop and implement per diem rates. Requires the Secretary to determine an appropriate manner for applying the PPS to Medicare low volume SNFs and swing bed hospitals. Provides for consolidated billing of covered services provided by a SNF, including services provided by other entities under arrangement. Requires payment to a SNF of claims for all Medicare part B (Supplementary Medical Insurance) SNF items and services, identified by code under a uniform coding system specified by the Secretary. Requires payment for physical, occupational, respiratory, and speech language pathology therapy services to reflect new salary equivalency guidelines finalized through the regulatory process. Directs the Secretary to establish a thorough medical review process to examine the effects of this Act on the quality of covered SNF services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries.
People & committees
Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S6094-6095)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.914 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.914 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.914 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.914 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.