Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 16, 2001
National Boxing Commission Act of 2001 - Establishes the National Boxing Commission to protect the health, safety, and general interests of boxers.Sets forth provisions for the licensing and registration of boxing personnel. Prohibits a person from competing in a boxing match or serving as a judge, referee, or other boxing official unless licensed under this Act. Requires the registration of promoters, managers, trainers, and related boxing personnel.Requires the Commission to: (1) maintain a unified national computerized registry for the collection, storage, and retrieval of specified information on professional boxers and other boxing personnel; and (2) certify for any boxing match the information publicized on the participating boxers' medical history, biographical information, and numbers of matches won and lost. Sets forth additional required functions of the Commission.Sets forth requirements for: (1) the suspension or revocation of licenses or registration issued under this Act; (2) the issuance of summary orders prohibiting the holding of certain proposed boxing matches; and (3) investigations of and injunctions against violations of this Act.Requires any agency that regulates professional boxing for a State or Indian tribe to submit a local boxing plan to the Commission.Requires annual audits of the Commission's finances by the General Accounting Office.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.893 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.893 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.893 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.893 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.