PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S347-355)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 22, 2001
Drug-Free America Act of 2001 - Domestic Narcotic Demand Reduction Act of 2001 - Drug Treatment and Research Enhancement Act of 2001 - Key Professionals Education Act - Amends the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to: (1) help key professionals participate in antidrug coalitions and assist youth affected by familial substance abuse; and (2) assist local communities improve the quality of substance abuse services. Requires the Director of the Institute on Drug Abuse to establish a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.Adolescent Therapeutic Community Treatment Programs Act - Directs: (1) the Secretary to award grants to enable treatment providers to establish adolescent residential substance abuse treatment programs; (2) the Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons to establish residential drug abuse treatment units in Federal prisons; and (3) the Counter-Drug Technology Assessment Center to study the number of individuals using heroin.Amends the National Narcotics Leadership Act to authorize appropriations for the drug-free communities support program.Drug-Free Families Act of 2001 - Directs the Attorney General to make a grant to the Parents Collaboration (a tax-exempt entity aimed at helping parents prevent drug abuse) to conduct a national campaign.National Community Antidrug Coalition Institute Act of 2001 - Authorizes grants to provide for the establishment of a National Community Antidrug Coalition Institute.Increases the number of National Guard members performing counter-drug activities. Authorizes the Chief of the National Guard Bureau to establish up to five National Guard counterdrug schools.Customs Authorization Act of 2001 - Authorizes appropriations for the U.S. Customs Service for enhanced inspection, trade facilitation, drug interdiction, and specified related activities. Establishes within the U.S. Customs Service an Automation Modernization Working Capital Fund to fund a program for modernizing Customs Service computer systems.Amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to establish civil penalties for violations of country of origin marking requirements.Directs the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the 11 Tethered Aerostat Radar System network sites are placed under the policy direction of the Drug Enforcement Policy and Support office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict.
People & committees
Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA] · R–IA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S347-355)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S346-347)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.89 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.89 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.89 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.89 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.