PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Prohibition on Financial Transactions With Countries Supporting Terrorism Act of 1997

Referred to Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, Government.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jun 10, 1997

Prohibition on Financial Transactions With Countries Supporting Terrorism Act of 1997 - Amends the Federal criminal code to repeal provisions providing for exceptions, pursuant to regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, to the prohibition on engaging in a financial transaction with the government of a country designated as a country supporting international terrorism. Makes such prohibition inapplicable to financial transactions: (1) engaged in by Federal officers or employees acting within official capacity; (2) for the sole purpose of providing humanitarian assistance in such countries; (3) involving travel or other activities by journalists or other members of the news media in such countries; or (4) within a certain class and with a specified country that are covered by a presidential determination that such transactions are vital to national security interests. Directs the President to report a determination to specified congressional committees at least 30 days before it is to take effect. Makes such determinations effective for 12 months and permits extensions.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Ashcroft, John [R-MO] · R–MO

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, Government.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5735-5736)

  3. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  4. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5463-5464)

  5. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.873 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.873 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.873 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.873 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources