PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Community Capital Partnership Act of 1993

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 30, 1993

Community Capital Partnership Act of 1993 - Amends the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 to make eligible for community investment corporation demonstration grants: (1) Federal and State credit unions; (2) certain nonprofit organizations; and (3) certain depository institutions. Increases the grant amounts available for capital assistance, development services, technical assistance, and training programs. Amends the Federal Credit Union Act to: (1) increase the appropriations authorized for the Community Development Revolving Loan Fund (the Fund); and (2) authorize the National Credit Union Administration Board to invest idle Fund moneys in U.S. Treasury securities, and to exercise the authority granted it by the Community Development Credit Union Revolving Loan Fund Transfer Act. Directs the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (the Secretary) to provide operating and capital assistance to existing community development banks, financial institutions, and corporations. Authorizes the Secretary to provide transition assistance to designated community development entities. Authorizes appropriations. Authorizes the Secretary to make grants to eligible nonprofit community development loan and investment funds. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Bradley, Bill [D-NJ] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
19 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5290-5291)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.861 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.861 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.861 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.861 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources