Professional Standards for Government Attorneys Act of 1999
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9377-9378)
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 21, 1999
Professional Standards for Government Attorneys Act of 1999 - Amends the Federal judicial code to provide that, subject to any uniform national rule prescribed by the U.S. Supreme Court, the standards of professional conduct governing a Government attorney shall be: (1) with respect to conduct in connection with a proceeding in or before a court, the standards established by the rules and decisions of that court; (2) with respect to conduct in connection with a pending or contemplated grand jury proceeding, the standards established by the rules and decisions of the court under whose authority the grand jury was impaneled; and (3) with respect to all other conduct, the standards established by the rules and decisions of the State in which the attorney is licensed to practice, with provisions applicable if the attorney is licensed to practice in more than one State. Requires the Judicial Conference of the United States to submit to the Chief Justice of the United States a report that shall include recommendations with respect to amending the Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure to provide for such a uniform national rule. Directs the Judicial Conference, in developing recommendations, to consider: (1) the needs and circumstances of multi-forum and multi-jurisdictional litigation; (2) the special needs and interests of the United States in investigating and prosecuting violations of Federal criminal and civil law; and (3) practices that are approved under Federal statutory or case law or that are otherwise consistent with traditional Federal law enforcement techniques. Specifies that nothing in this Act may be construed to abridge, enlarge, or modify the power of the Supreme Court or of any court established by an Act of Congress to prescribe standards of professional conduct for attorneys practicing in and before the Federal courts, including Government attorneys.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.855 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.855 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.855 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.855 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.