Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Jan 21, 1993
Financial Services Access Act of 1993 - (Secs. 3-4) Prescribes guidelines under which: (1) each depository institution must offer a basic financial services account under which an account holder may obtain either basic transaction account services or government check cashing account services; and (2) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) must develop a model application form for the use of depository institutions offering such accounts. (Secs. 5-6) Sets forth the criteria for basic transaction services accounts and government check cashing services accounts. (Sec. 7) Requires a depository institution to conspicuously disclose the availability of such accounts in its public areas. (Secs. 8-9) Requires certain credit unions to offer basic financial services accounts. Exempts certain depository institutions from the requirements of this Act. (Secs. 10-11) Prescribes guidelines for fraud prevention and administrative enforcement. (Secs. 13-16) Requires a study and report to the Congress by: (1) the Board on the incidence of fraud in connection with government check cashing services; (2) the Secretary of the Treasury on the feasibility of staggering Federal recurring payments; and (3) the Comptroller General on using the Postal Service as a supplemental provider of government check cashing services and on using direct deposit for Federal recurring payments.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.85 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.85 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.85 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.85 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.