Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 9, 2001
Agency Accountability Act of 2001 - Requires the head of certain covered agencies, before the publication of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis, to: (1) notify the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration; (2) provide such Chief Counsel with information on the potential impacts of the proposed rule on small businesses; (3) identify affected small business representatives; and (4) transmit to such representatives a detailed summary of the information provided to the Chief Counsel. Requires the convening of a review panel for the draft proposed rule, which shall utilize the advice and recommendations of the small business representatives during the rule review process.Allows the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to either conduct the required panel review or not follow the review procedures with respect to a temporary regulation, but requires the IRS to notify the Chief Counsel of the reasons for not following such procedures.Requires an initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis to include assessments of the costs and benefits to small businesses of the proposed and final rule.Requires agency publication of the decision to certify a rule that such agency determines will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses, including a summary of the analysis and data supporting such decision.Provides for judicial review of rule certification decisions.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.849 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.849 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.849 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.849 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.