Greater Access to Affordable Pharmaceuticals Act of 2002
Held at the desk.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Jul 31, 2002
Title I: Greater Access to Affordable Pharmaceuticals - Greater Access to Affordable Pharmaceuticals Act of 2002 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise provisions concerning the timing of generic drug availability.(Sec. 103) Requires applicants (pharmaceutical companies) to register their patents with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within 30 days of approval (or issuance for subsequently issued patents).Makes failure to timely register a bar to civil actions for patent infringement.Requires applications for new drugs (NDA) or abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) which rely upon investigations not conducted by or for the applicant and which concern a patent that claims both the drug and a method of use or more than one method of use to include a certification on a claim-by-claim basis that the patent is invalid or will not be infringed (known as a Paragraph IV filing/certification) by the new drug's (generic) manufacture and a statement regarding the method(s) of use claim.(Sec. 104) Prohibits (for subsequently issued patents) an extension of the 30 month stay of FDA approval for any new drug where an ANDA or NDA contains a Paragraph IV filing/certification and the patent holder indicates an intention to bring a patent infringement suit against the new (generic) drug's manufacturer.Makes failure to timely file (within 45 days of notice of a Paragraph IV filing) a civil action for infringement a bar to later action.(Sec. 105) Requires the first generic applicant with a Paragraph IV filing to forfeit the 180 day marketing exclusivity period to a subsequent generic applicant if the first generic applicant engages in certain behaviors which cause the generic drug not to be brought timely to market.(Sec. 106) Revises notice requirements for Paragraph IV filings to include and protect certain proposed formulation, composition, or method of use information.Excludes an applicants's ability to pay damages from a court's consideration of whether or not to provide injunctive relief before the expiration of the 30 month stay of approval period.(Sec. 107) Continues existing regulations and authorities regarding the bioequivalence of drugs and biological products.(Sec. 108) Requires the Federal Trade Commission to report to Congress on how this Act has brought generic drugs to market faster.(Sec. 109) Makes technical and conforming amendments.Title II: Importation of Prescription Drugs - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to permit pharmacists and wholesalers to import (reimport) U.S. made prescription drugs into the United States from Canada.Requires an importer to keep detailed records, including a drug's formulation, lot or control number, chain of distribution, and laboratory records.Requires Canadian sellers to register with the Secretary. Directs the Secretary to suspend the importation of a drug or importations by a particular importer if a pattern emerges which suggests a risk to public health through counterfeit or other violations.Prohibits drug manufacturers from offering pharmacists and wholesalers terms less favorable than those offered to a foreign purchaser. Prohibits a manufacturer from restricting access to a prescription drug that is permitted to be imported into the United States.Declares that enforcement efforts concerning importation of prescription drugs by individuals should focus on significant threats to public health rather than importation that is clearly for personal use, particularly importation from Canada.Provides for studies and reports to Congress by the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine and the Comptroller General concerning the effects of this Act, addressing compliance issues as well as its effect on trade, patent rights, and pricing.Authorizes appropriations.(Sec. 202) Amends title IX of the Social Security Act (Medicaid ) to permit States to enter into Medicaid-like drug rebate agreements with drug manufacturers on behalf of non-Medicaid residents.(Sec. 203) Provides additional, temporary funding to States through the Medicaid FMAP (Federal medical assistance percentage) if a State plan's eligibility requirements are no more restrictive than those in effect on January 1, 2002. Increases the cap on Medicaid payments to the territories.Amends title XX (Block Grants to States for Social Services) to provide State fiscal relief allotments, available through FY 2004.
Source last updated: Apr 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.812 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.812 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.812 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.812 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.