PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2015

Became Public Law No: 114-110.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 18, 2015

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The expanded summary of the Senate reported version is repeated here.)

Surface Transportation Board Reauthorization Act of 2015

(Sec. 3) Removes the Surface Transportation Board from the Department of Transportation (DOT) to establish it as an independent U.S. agency.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

Repeals the requirement that DOT provide administrative support for the Board.

(Sec. 4) Increases Board membership from three to five members.

Increases from two to three the minimum number of Board members who must have professional standing and demonstrated knowledge in the fields of transportation, transportation regulation, or economic regulation.

Increases from one to two the minimum number of Board members who must have professional or business experience (including agriculture) in the private sector.

(Sec. 5) Authorizes a majority of Board members to hold a meeting not open to the public to discuss official business if:

no formal or informal vote or other official agency action is taken,

each individual present is a Board member or employee, and

the Board's General Counsel is present.

Requires the Board to disclose topics and participants within two business days after any non-public meeting, unless the discussion relates to an ongoing proceeding, in which case the required disclosure is postponed till the date of the final Board decision.

(Sec. 6) Requires the Board to:

establish a database of rail service complaints it has received, and

post quarterly reports of rail rate reasonableness cases as well as rail service complaints it has received on its website. (Sec. 7) Reauthorizes appropriations for FY2016-FY2020 for the Board.

(Sec. 8) Allows a rail carrier's agent to be located outside of Washington, DC.

(Sec. 9) Grants the DOT Inspector General authority to review only the financial management, property management, and business operations of the Board to determine its compliance with federal laws, rules, and regulations. Authorizes appropriations.

(Sec. 11) Requires the Board to:

maintain one or more simplified and expedited methods for determining the reasonableness of challenged rail rates in cases where a full stand-alone cost presentation is too costly, given the value of the case; and

maintain procedures to ensure expeditious handling of challenges to the reasonableness of rail rates.

Prescribes time limits for Board review of rail rate reasonableness cases, including:

150 days for discovery, 155 days for development of the evidentiary record, 60 days for submission of a closing brief, and 180 days for a final Board decision.

Authorizes the Board to extend a timeline after a request from any party or in the interest of due process.

Repeals certain rail service contract limitations involving the transportation of agricultural commodities.

(Sec. 12) Authorizes the Board to investigate rail carrier and pipeline carrier violations on its own initiative as well as on complaint (as under existing law). Prescribes requirements for investigations commenced on the Board's own initiative.

(Sec. 13) Requires the Board to establish a voluntary binding arbitration process to resolve rail rate and practice disputes.

(Sec. 14) Directs the Government Accountability Office to study rail rate contract proposals containing multiple origin-to-destination movements.

(Sec. 15) Directs the Board to report to Congress on whether:

current large rate case methodologies are sufficient, not unduly complex, and cost effective; and sound economic alternative methodologies exist, or could be developed, to streamline and expedite large rate cases.

Requires the Board to make quarterly reports to Congress on its progress toward addressing the issues raised in each unfinished regulatory proceeding, regardless of whether the proceeding is subject to a statutory or regulatory deadline.

(Sec. 16) Requires Board standards and procedures for establishing revenue levels for rail carriers to be adequate for the infrastructure and investment needed to meet the present and future demand for rail services.

(Sec. 17) Declares that nothing in this Act may be construed to affect any suit commenced by or against the Board, or any proceeding or challenge pending before it, before the enactment of this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] · R–SD

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 114-110.

  2. Became Public Law No: 114-110.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H9218-9221)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H9218-9221)

  10. DEBATE - The House resumed debate on S. 808.

  11. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 808.

  12. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H9218-9223)

  13. Mr. Shuster moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  14. Held at the desk.

  15. Received in the House.

  16. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  17. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4329-4331; text as passed Senate: CR S4329-4331)

  18. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4329-4331; text as passed Senate: CR S4329-4331)

  19. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 94.

  20. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Thune without amendment. With written report No. 114-52.

  21. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Thune without amendment. With written report No. 114-52.

  22. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  23. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

  24. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.808 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.808 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.808 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.808 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources