PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Base Transition Acceleration Act of 1995

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · May 15, 1995

Base Transition Acceleration Act of 1995 - Amends the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to direct the Secretary of Defense, with respect to the disposal of buildings and property located at military installations approved for closure under such Act after January 1, 1995, to ensure that final determinations regarding whether another Federal department or agency has identified a use for, or will accept a transfer of, any portion of such an installation are completed no later than 60 days after the date of approval of closure of the installation. Requires publication in the Federal Register of the results of such determinations. Requires the redevelopment authority (RA) for such installation, within 180 days after the completion of such determinations, to prepare and submit to the Secretary a redevelopment plan for the installation that addresses the buildings and property that are not claimed for use or transfer by another Federal department or agency. States that an RA shall consist of such State, local, or tribal governments, or citizens residing in the vicinity, of such installation. Requires the Secretary to accept or reject a redevelopment plan within 60 days of its submission, with appropriate notification to the RA. Allows an RA whose plan has been rejected to submit a revised plan for consideration within 90 days after such notification, and requires the Secretary to accept or reject such revised plan within 30 days of submission, with appropriate RA notification. Provides for disposal of an installation's buildings and property to another Federal department or agency, or in accordance with an accepted redevelopment plan, as appropriate. Allows the Secretary to postpone or extend any deadline provided under this Act if determined to be in the best interests of the communities affected by the closure of the installation.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. McCain, John [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Armed Services Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

    2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S6688-6689)

    3. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.803 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.803 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.803 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.803 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources