PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Arson Prevention Act of 1993

See also H.R. 1727.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 20, 1993

Arson Prevention Act of 1993 - Amends the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to direct the Administrator of the United States Fire Administration, through the Office of Fire Prevention and Arson Control, to carry out a demonstration program to provide two-year grants to States for programs relating to arson research, prevention, and control. Sets forth State funding requirements and provides for additional renewal periods for such grants. Authorizes appropriations, including appropriations for the expansion of arson investigator training programs at the National Fire Academy and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center or through regional delivery sites.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Bryan, Richard H. [D-NV] · D–NV

Committees

  • Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
7 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. See also H.R. 1727.

  2. Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6295)

  3. Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 331. (consideration: CR S16986)

  4. Senate passed companion measure H.R. 1727 in lieu of this measure by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S16986)

  5. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 1727 as an amendment. (consideration: CR S16986)

  6. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 331.

  7. Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator Hollings without amendment. With written report No. 103-204.

  8. Committee on Commerce. Reported to Senate by Senator Hollings without amendment. With written report No. 103-204.

  9. Committee on Commerce. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  10. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce.

  11. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4686-4687)

  12. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.798 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.798 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.798 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.798 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources