PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to continue the authorization of appropriations for the East Court of the National Museum of Natural History, and for other purposes.

Became Public Law No: 103-98.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 7, 1993

Amends Federal law which authorizes the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, construct, and equip space in the East Court of the National Museum of Natural History to provide that the appropriation authorized for such purpose is to continue for fiscal years after FY 1991.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Sasser, Jim [D-TN] · D–TN

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Committee on House Administration
  • Rules and Administration Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 103-98.

  2. Became Public Law No: 103-98.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

  11. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6798-6799)

  12. Mr. Clay moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  13. Reported by the Committee on Public Works + Transportation. H. Rept. 103-232, Part I.

  14. Reported by the Committee on Public Works + Transportation. H. Rept. 103-232, Part I.

  15. Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

  16. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  17. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.

  18. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

  19. Referred to the Subcommittee on Public Buildings and Grounds.

  20. Referred to the Subcommittee on Libraries and Memorials.

  21. Referred jointly to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

  22. Referred jointly to the House Committee on House Administration.

  23. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  24. Received in the House.

  25. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6887)

  26. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S6887)

  27. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 71.

  28. Committee on Rules. Reported to Senate by Senator Ford without amendment. With written report No. 103-48.

  29. Committee on Rules. Reported to Senate by Senator Ford without amendment. With written report No. 103-48.

  30. Committee on Rules. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  31. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules.

  32. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.779 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.779 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.779 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.779 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources