PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Hardrock Mining Reform Act of 1993

H.R. 322 passed in Senate relating to this measure.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 5, 1993

Hardrock Mining Reform Act of 1993 - Renames the Act of July 23, 1955, as the Surface Resources Act of 1955, and the Act of July 31, 1947, as the Materials Act of 1947. Sets forth fees for mining claim location and maintenance, including waivers and reduced fees for claimants holding fewer than 50 claims. Amends certain Federal mining law to limit the requirement that at least $100 worth of labor or improvements be performed annually on claims located after May 1872 to claims that are eligible for a waiver or reduced fee under this Act. Imposes royalties upon the production and sale of locatable minerals from any mining claim located after enactment of this Act. Establishes the Hardrock Mining Royalty Review Commission to review and report to certain congressional committees on the effect of such royalties upon the hardrock mining industry. Sets forth limitations upon federally issued mining patents. Prohibits mineral activities on Federal land that cause more than a minimal disturbance of surface resources unless a plan of operations has been approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Mandates that: (1) all operations under such plan be conducted in accordance with Federal and State environmental laws and be inspected quarterly for compliance and/or enforcement; (2) lands patented after enactment of this Act be subject to State and/or Federal mining reclamation laws; and (3) financial assurances for land reclamation be provided. Proscribes full- or part-time residential occupancy of a mining claim. Amends the Surface Resources Act of 1955 to subject certain mineral deposits to the disposal requirements of the Materials Act of 1947. Prescribes percentage guidelines for allocation of receipts received under this Act between the Federal Treasury and the applicable State treasury. Establishes the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Reclamation program under which grants shall be made to eligible States for reclamation and restoration of land and water resources adversely affected by past hardrock mining. Directs the Secretary to approve any State abandoned minerals mine reclamation program upon finding that it has the means and necessary legislation to implement such program, and the program complies with this Act. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Craig, Larry E. [R-ID] · R–ID

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. H.R. 322 passed in Senate relating to this measure.

  2. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 322 as an amendment. (consideration: CR S16984)

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

  4. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  5. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  6. Received in the House.

  7. Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6479-6482)

  8. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S6479-6482)

  9. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 65.

  10. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston without amendment. With written report No. 103-45. Additional views filed.

  11. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Johnston without amendment. With written report No. 103-45. Additional views filed.

  12. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  13. Subcommittee on Mineral Resources Development. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-387.

  14. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.

  15. Referred to Subcommittee on Mineral Resources Development.

  16. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  17. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4544-4545)

  18. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.775 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.775 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.775 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.775 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources