PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 46 Ohio Street in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the "Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse".

Became Public Law No: 108-35.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 2, 2003

Designates the Federal building and U.S. courthouse located at 46 East Ohio Street in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Lugar, Richard G. [R-IN] · R–IN

Committees

  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Environment and Public Works Committee
11 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 108-35.

  2. Became Public Law No: 108-35.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 383 - 0 (Roll no. 251). (text: CR H5052)

    House roll call 251 · Individual votes
  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 383 - 0 (Roll no. 251).(text: CR H5052)

    House roll call 251 · Individual votes
  10. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5055-5056)

  11. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  12. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 763.

  13. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5052-5053)

  14. Mr. Pearce moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  15. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 235 - 179 (Roll no. 232). (text: CR H4806)

    House roll call 232 · Individual votes
  16. Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 235 - 179 (Roll no. 232).(text: CR H4806)

    House roll call 232 · Individual votes
  17. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4810-4811)

  18. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  19. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 763.

  20. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4806-4809)

  21. Mr. LaTourette moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  22. Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings and Emergency Management.

  23. Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

  24. Received in the House.

  25. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  26. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5395-5396; text as passed Senate: CR S5396)

  27. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5395-5396; text as passed Senate: CR S5396)

  28. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 65.

  29. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Inhofe without amendment. Without written report.

  30. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported by Senator Inhofe without amendment. Without written report.

  31. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  32. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  33. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4704)

  34. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.763 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.763 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.763 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.763 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources