PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Tax Court Modernization Act

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 84.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 1, 2003

Tax Court Modernization Act - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to limit jurisdiction over collection due process case appeals to the Tax Court.Permits the Tax Court to assign proceedings to decide small employment tax dispute cases to special trial judges.Confirms that the Tax Court may apply the doctrine of equitable recoupment to the same extent that it is available in civil tax cases.Permits the Tax Court to charge up to a $60 fling fee in all cases commenced by the filing of a petition.Permits the Tax Court to establish its own personnel management system and establishes system requirements.Permits Tax Court practitioner fees to be used to provide services to pro se taxpayers.Revises provisions concerning annuities for survivors of Tax Court judges.Provides for FEGLI participation for Tax Court judges.Authorizes payment of FEGLI premium increases for judges over age 65.Entitles a judge employed by the Executive Branch before appointment to the Tax Court to a lump-sum payment for the balance of accrued annual leave on appointment to the Tax Court.Permits Tax Court judges to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan, but prohibits agency contributions.Exempts, from outside earned income limitations, compensation to retired judges for qualified teaching activities.Permits the chief judge to appoint and reappoint magistrate judges (currently, special judges) of the Tax Court for eight year terms.Permits magistrate judges to elect to participate in the Tax Court survivor annuity plan.Establishes a retirement and annuity program for magistrate judges.Makes special retirement annuity provisions for incumbent magistrate judges.Establishes rules for the recall of retired magistrate judges.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hatch, Orrin G. [R-UT] · R–UT

Committees

  • Finance Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 84.

  2. Committee on Finance. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. With written report No. 108-42.

  3. Committee on Finance. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. With written report No. 108-42.

  4. Committee on Finance. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  5. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

  6. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4635-4636)

  7. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.753 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.753 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.753 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.753 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources