PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to Subcommittee on Courts and Administrative Practice.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 2, 1993
Directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park Service, to: (1) perform a blood test of each bison in the herd inhabiting Yellowstone National Park for brucellosis; (2) vaccinate and restrain under quarantine restrictions each bison that tests negative for brucellosis in accordance with a protocol established under Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming law, to prevent transmission of brucellosis to susceptible animals; (3) slaughter or neuter each bison that tests positive for brucellosis, each bison that cannot be tested, and each bison that tests negative but cannot be restrained under quarantine restriction and make the carcass or neutered bison available for use by Indian tribes and other suitable recipients; (4) engage the services of a team of independent range scientists to determine the optimum population of bison that the land available for the herd in the Park is capable of sustaining; (5) identify locations outside the Park that would be suitable for sustaining herds of bison created from any excess number of bison in the Park's herd that are certified as being free of brucellosis; and (6) after brucellosis has been eradicated, continue to reduce the population of the Park's herd to a number that is approximately 500 below the optimum population by transferring the excess number of bison to locations identified in this Act. Requires the Secretary, after December 31, 1998, to ensure that the number of bison in the Park's herd does not exceed the optimum population determined under this Act.
People & committees
Sen. Simon, Paul [D-IL] · D–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to Subcommittee on Courts and Administrative Practice.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4409-4410)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.745 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.745 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.745 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.745 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.