Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2150-2151)

S.716 through Congress

S.716 keeps its number as it moves between the House and Senate.

SenateApr 4, 2011IntroducedOfficial record

Major milestones in the imported record. See all actions.

No House action is available in our imported record yet.

Separate related House measures (2)

These are different measures identified as related by Congress.gov. Their text and outcomes may differ; they are not the House stage of S.716.

Related House bill: H.R.2253 To establish within the Department of Education the Innovation Inspiration school grant program, and for other purposes.

Related House bill: H.R.2247 Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 4, 2011

Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act - Authorizes the Secretary of Education to award competitive matching grants to local educational agencies (LEAs) to: (1) promote science, technology, engineering (including robotics), and mathematics (STEM) in secondary schools; (2) support the participation of secondary school students in nontraditional STEM teaching methods; and (3) broaden secondary school students' access to STEM careers.

Gives priority to grant applications that target: (1) a rural or urban school, (2) a low-performing school or LEA, or (3) an LEA or school that serves students who are eligible for free or reduced price lunches under the school lunch program.

Authorizes the Secretary to waive all or part of the matching requirement for financially-strapped LEAs.

Directs the Secretary to evaluate the efficacy of the grant program.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH] · D–NH

Committees

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee

8 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Apr 6, 2011
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2150-2151)
Apr 4, 2011
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Apr 4, 2011
Introduced in Senate

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Introduced in Senate · Apr 4, 2011 Formatted Text PDF Formatted XML

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.716 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.716, 112th Congress: Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/716

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2011-04-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/s716/BILLS-112s716is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T18:53:52Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze S.716 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.716 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.716, 112th Congress: Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/716

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2011-04-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/s716/BILLS-112s716is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T18:53:52Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.716 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.716 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.716, 112th Congress: Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/716

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2011-04-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/s716/BILLS-112s716is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T18:53:52Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.716 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.716 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss S.716, 112th Congress: Innovation Inspiration School Grant Program Act

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/716

Text version to examine: Introduced in Senate · 2011-04-04.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/112/bills/s716/BILLS-112s716is.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-12-05T18:53:52Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine S.716 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.