PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Strengthening Abuse and Neglect Courts Act of 1999

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 24, 1999

Strengthening Abuse and Neglect Courts Act of 1999 - Directs the Attorney General to award grants to State and local courts to: (1) enable such courts to develop and implement automated data collection and case-tracking systems for proceedings conducted by, or under the supervision of, an abuse and neglect court; (2) encourage the replication of such systems in abuse and neglect courts in other jurisdictions; and (3) require the use of such systems to evaluate a court's performance in complying with requirements of part B (child and family services) and part E (Federal payments for foster care and adoption assistance) of title IV of the Social Security Act.Sets forth provisions regarding limits on the number and use of grants, application and matching requirements, considerations in evaluating grant applications, length of awards, fund availability, and reporting requirements for grantees and the Attorney General. Authorizes appropriations.(Sec. 5) Amends the Social Security Act (the Act) to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make grants, subject to appropriations, to State or local courts for purposes of: (1) promoting the permanency goals established in the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA); and (2) enabling such courts to reduce existing backlogs of cases pending in abuse and neglect courts, especially regarding cases to terminate parental rights and cases in which parental rights to a child have been terminated but an adoption of the child has not yet been finalized.Sets forth provisions regarding application requirements, use of funds, number of grants, funds availability, and a report on the use of funds. Authorizes appropriations.(Sec. 6) Amends the Act to include as a component of the quarterly Federal payments to States for foster care and adoption assistance programs an amount equal to 75 percent of State program expenditures during the quarter for training of judges, judicial personnel, law enforcement personal, agency attorneys, attorneys representing parents in proceedings conducted by or under the supervision of an abuse and neglect court, attorneys representing children in such proceedings, guardians ad litem, and volunteers who participate in court-appointed special advocate programs to the extent such training is related to provisions of and amendments made by ASFA, provided that any such training that is offered to judges or other judicial personnel shall be offered by or under contract with the State or local agency in collaboration with the judicial conference or other appropriate judicial governing body operating in the State.(Sec. 7) Amends the Act to require the State plan, in order for a State to be eligible for such payments, to provide that the State (by January 1, 2001) develop and encourage the implementation of guidelines for all agency attorneys, including legal education requirements for such attorneys regarding the handling of abuse, neglect, and dependency proceedings.(Sec. 8) Directs the Secretary to provide technical assistance, training, and evaluations authorized under this section through grants, contracts, or cooperative arrangements with other entities, and ensure that entities that have not had a previous contractual relationship with a Federal agency can compete for such grants.Provides that technical assistance shall be provided for the purpose of supporting and assisting State and local courts that handle child abuse, neglect, and dependency matters to effectively carry out new responsibilities enacted as part of ASFA and to speed the process of adoption of children and legal finalization of permanent families for children in foster care by improving practices of the courts involved in that process.Sets forth provisions regarding permissible activities under this section, including specialized training on child development that is appropriate for court-related personnel and the development of standards of practice for agency attorneys. Requires that any training offered to judicial personnel be offered in collaboration with the judicial conference or other appropriate judicial governing body. Authorizes appropriations.(Sec. 9) Directs the Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention to make a grant to the National Court-Appointed Special Advocate Association for purposes of: (1) expanding the recruitment of, and building the capacity of, court- appointed special advocate programs located in the 15 largest urban areas; (2) developing regional, multijurisdictional special advocate programs serving rural areas; and (3) providing training and supervision of volunteers in special advocate programs.Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) limits on administrative expenditures; and (2) determination of what constitutes urban and rural areas. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. DeWine, Mike [R-OH] · R–OH

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
14 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3262-3263, S3267-3268)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.708 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.708 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.708 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.708 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources