PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Sexual Violence Prevention and Victim's Rights Act of 1995

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 6, 1995

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Title I: Equal Protection for Victims Title II: Sexual Violence, Domestic Violence, and Offenses Against the Family Sexual Violence Prevention and Victim's Rights Act of 1995 - Title I: Equal Protection for Victims - Amends the Federal criminal code to require (current law authorizes) the court to order restitution of the victim when a convicted defendant is being sentenced for specified offenses. Authorizes a court to order restitution of any person who was harmed physically, emotionally, or pecuniarily by unlawful conduct of the defendant during the offense or during the course of a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of unlawful activity related to the offense. Sets forth provisions regarding: (1) consideration of the offender's financial assets and obligations; (2) the form of payments; (3) situations involving multiple offenders or victims; (4) compensation for losses from insurance or other sources; (5) setoffs against amounts later recovered as compensatory damages; and (6) enforcement of restitution orders. Amends: (1) rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to entitle each side to six peremptory challenges if the offense charged is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (2) rule 32 regarding the victim's right of allocution in sentencing; and (3) rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) regarding rebuttal of attacks on the victim's character. Enacts Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers in Federal Practice. Amends the Federal criminal code to repeal a requirement that notice of release of prisoners be used solely for law enforcement purposes. Amends the Federal judicial code regarding the balance in the composition of rules committees. Title II: Sexual Violence, Domestic Violence, and Offenses Against the Family - Repeals specified provisions of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (VCCLEA) with respect to evidence of similar acts in civil cases concerning sexual assault or child molestation. Provides that the amendments not repealed (making such evidence admissible under certain circumstances) shall take effect on the date of this Act's enactment. Requires: (1) the testing of defendants for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in sexual assault cases, with exceptions, with disclosure of the results to the court, the victim, the attorney for the Government, and the person tested; and (2) the U.S. Sentencing Commission to amend existing guidelines for sex crime offenses to enhance the sentence if the offender knew that he was infected with HIV, with exceptions. Revises the VCCLEA to authorize the Government (currently, limited to the victim) to obtain an order requiring that the defendant be tested for the presence of the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome and that the results be communicated to the victim's parent or legal guardian, as appropriate (currently, limited to the victim and the defendant). Revises requirements to be met by the victim to obtain an order for such test. Amends FRE: (1) 404 regarding evidence of the defendant's disposition towards the victim in domestic violence and other cases; and (2) 702 regarding battered women's syndrome evidence. Amends the Federal criminal code to provide for the death penalty for fatal domestic violence offenses.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Kyl, Jon [R-AZ] · R–AZ

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S5427)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.694 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.694 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.694 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.694 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources