PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Poison Control Center Enhancement and Awareness Act Amendments of 2003

Became Public Law No: 108-194.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 21, 2003

Poison Control Center Enhancement and Awareness Act Amendments of 2003 - Amends the Poison Control Enhancement and Awareness Act to authorize appropriations for: (1) the maintenance of a national toll-free number to access regional poison control centers; and (2) the nationwide media campaign to promote poison control center utilization.Amends provisions pertaining to the poison control center grant program, including to provide funds for: (1) developing standardized poison prevention and poison control centers; and (2) improving national toxic exposure surveillance. Modifies provisions pertaining to the renewal of a waiver of the certification requirements for receiving poison control center grants.Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to assist in the implementation and maintenance of continuos national toxicosurveillance of poison control center data to detect new hazards from various sources, including household products.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. DeWine, Mike [R-OH] · R–OH

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 108-194.

  2. Became Public Law No: 108-194.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  8. Senate agreed to House amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S16201; text as Senate agreed to House amendment: CR S16201)

  9. Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to House amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S16201; text as Senate agreed to House amendment: CR S16201)

  10. Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.

  11. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  12. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 420 - 1 (Roll no. 647). (text: CR 11/19/2003 H11574-11575)

    House roll call 647 · Individual votes
  13. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 420 - 1 (Roll no. 647).(text: CR 11/19/2003 H11574-11575)

    House roll call 647 · Individual votes
  14. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H11666-11667)

  15. At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

  16. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 686.

  17. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11574-11577)

  18. Mr. Bilirakis moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

  19. Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

  20. Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

  21. Received in the House.

  22. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  23. Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8316-8317; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S8316; text as passed Senate: CR S8316-8317)

  24. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8316-8317; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR S8316; text as passed Senate: CR S8316-8317)

  25. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 133.

  26. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Gregg with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 108-68.

  27. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Gregg with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 108-68.

  28. Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  29. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S4287)

  30. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4286-4287)

  31. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.686 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.686 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.686 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.686 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources