PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 348.
Congressional Research Service
Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Apr 29, 1998
Petroglyph National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park Service (NPS) and the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico (city), to enter into negotiations to provide for the management of storm water runoff and drainage within the Petroglyph National Monument, including the design and construction of any necessary storm water corridors, conveyances, and easements within Monument boundaries. Requires the city to provide the NPS with design specifications for certain construction initiated within a Monument utility corridor. Amends the Petroglyph National Monument Establishment Act of 1990 to: (1) revise Federal acquisition authority (and conditions) with respect to lands owned by the State or a political subdivision within Monument boundaries; (2) adjust the Monument boundary to exclude the Paseo Del Norte Corridor in the Piedras Marcadas Unit as described in a specified document; and (3) authorize the Secretary to employ current city employees assigned to the Boca Negra or Piedras Marcadas units of the Monument if responsibility for the operation, maintenance, and repair of property within such units is transferred to NPS. Directs the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to allow the use of the existing access road to the Double Eagle II Airport for visitor access to the Monument.
People & committees
Sen. Domenici, Pete V. [R-NM] · R–NM
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 348.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 105-176.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 105-176.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, and Office of Management and Budget.
Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 105-368.
Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3552-3553)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.633 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.633 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.633 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.633 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.