Bank Customer Confidentiality and Protection Act of 1995
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 28, 1995
Bank Customer Confidentiality and Protection Act of 1995 - Amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) to declare that it is unlawful for an insured depository institution which sponsors, sells, or solicits the purchase of a nondeposit investment product to represent that such product is either federally approved or guaranteed, or FDIA-insured. Sets forth customer disclosure requirements for such products, including: (1) that such products carry risk of a loss of principal; (2) the nature of the relationship between the insured depository institution and the broker or dealer, and any higher or special compensation the broker or dealer would receive for the sale of certain types of nondeposit investment products; (3) any fees incurrable in connection with the product; and (4) a written customer acknowledgment of such disclosures. Permits a one-time referral fee paid to an insured depository institution employee who refers a bank customer to securities salespeople if the fee is not based upon customer purchase. Mandates prominent written disclosures to customers that the joint marketing of nondeposit investment products on the premises of the insured depository institution is separate and distinct from such institution and is not insured. Places restrictions upon the advertising and solicitation of nondeposit investment products by an insured depository institution, including the use of nonpublic customer information. Directs the appropriate Federal banking agencies and the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate regulations to reflect this Act and to coordinate their enforcement methods.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.633 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.633 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.633 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.633 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.