Senate Election Reform Act of 1993 - Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for spending limits and benefits for Senate primary, runoff, and general elections. (Sec. 2) Limits personal and election expenditures. Prohibits benefits to a candidate who exceeds specified general and runoff election spending levels. Requires the Secretary to maintain in the Presidential Election Campaign Fund the Senate Account for the deposit of funds for payments to eligible candidates. Establishes criminal penalties for knowing or willful violations of this Act. (Sec. 3) Amends the Internal Revenue Code to increase the amount an individual may designate to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund. (Sec. 4) Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to require a licensee who permits a broadcasting station to broadcast material which either endorses or opposes a Federal candidate to provide equal free time to any eligible candidate opposing the candidate endorsed or to any eligible candidate who was so opposed. Increases the period of time during which the charges made for the use of any broadcast station shall not exceed the lowest unit charge of such station. (Sec. 5) Sets forth reporting requirements for Senate candidates relating to spending limitations, candidacy eligibility, and independent expenditures. Limits the amount that multicandidate political committees (PACs) may contribute to House elections to $100,000 for a general or special election and $25,000 for a runoff election. Limits contributions to Senate elections to ten percent of spending limits established by this Act. (Sec. 7) Provides for the accountability of contributions made by intermediaries or conduits. (Sec. 9) Requires, when independent expenditures are made for television broadcast, showing the name of the person or committee making such expenditure. Requires any type of general public communication to include such statement. (Sec. 11) Includes certain extensions of credit as contributions to a Senate candidate. (Sec. 12) Amends provisions of law regarding the Postal Service to provide for reduced postal rates for eligible Senate candidates. (Sec. 13) Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require a non-eligible Senate candidate to disclose in advertisements or announcements that such candidate has not agreed to spending limits. (Sec. 14) Repeals the exception which permits a Member of Congress who was such a Member on January 8, 1980, to convert excess campaign contributions to personal use. (Sec. 16) Prohibits a State committee of a political party from making any expenditure in connection with the general election campaign of any presidential candidate affiliated with such party. Subjects to Federal fundraising and expenditure limitations any amount solicited, received, or spent by a national, State, or local committee of a political party, if such amount is solicited, received, or spent in connection with a Federal election. (Sec. 17) Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to revise membership requirements of the Federal Election Commission. (Sec. 18) Increases the period of time preceding an election during which franked mass mail may not be mailed. (Sec. 19) Prohibits a candidate for Congress from having any authorized committee other than his or her principal campaign committee.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.62 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.62 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.62 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.62 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.