PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Desalinization Research and Development Act of 1994

Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 18, 1993

Desalinization Research and Development Act of 1993 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army to conduct a basic research and development program to gain knowledge concerning the most efficient means by which usable water can be produced from saline water. Grants the Secretaries authority to design and construct desalinization facilities in cost-sharing cooperation with applying sponsors. Directs the President to instruct the Agency for International Development to sponsor an international desalinization conference to explore new technologies of affordable desalinization and propose a research agenda. Requires reports to the Congress and the President. Authorizes appropriations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Simon, Paul [D-IL] · D–IL

Committees

  • Natural Resources Committee
  • Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
  • Science, Space, and Technology Committee
  • Environment and Public Works Committee
8 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.

  2. Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Science.

  4. Referred jointly to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.

  5. Referred jointly to the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.

  6. Referred jointly to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  7. Received in the House.

  8. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  9. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S10891)

  10. Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S10609-10612)

  11. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with amendments by Voice Vote.(consideration: CR S10609-10612)

  12. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 532.

  13. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus with amendments. With written report No. 103-320.

  14. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Reported to Senate by Senator Baucus with amendments. With written report No. 103-320.

  15. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.

  16. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S14023-14025)

  17. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  18. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3185-3186)

  19. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.617 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.617 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.617 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.617 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources