PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred jointly to the Committees on Finance; Governmental Affairs by unanimous consent.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Apr 17, 1997
Fort Campbell Tax Fairness Act of 1997 - Amends Federal law to subject pay and compensation paid by the United States for personal services as a U.S. employee or paid for personal services under a contract with the United States at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to taxation by the State of Kentucky (or its subdivisions) only if the individual performing the services is a resident of Kentucky (or the subdivision).
People & committees
Sen. Thompson, Fred [R-TN] · R–TN
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred jointly to the Committees on Finance; Governmental Affairs by unanimous consent.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3361)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.613 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.613 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.613 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.613 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.