Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 438.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Mar 2, 2000
Amends the Webb-Kenyon Act to authorize a State attorney general (State AG) who has reasonable cause to believe that a person is engaging in any act that would constitute a violation of State law regulating the importation or transportation of any intoxicating liquor to bring a civil action for injunctive relief to: (1) restrain the person from engaging in the violation; and (2) enforce compliance with State law.Grants U.S. district courts jurisdiction over any such action brought by a State AG against any person, except one licensed or otherwise authorized to produce, sell, or store intoxicating liquor in such State. Authorizes such action to be brought in the district in which the recipient of such liquor resides or is found. Limits such action to that seeking injunctive relief (a preliminary injunction, permanent injunction, or both). Directs that such action be tried before the court.Authorizes the court, in such an action and upon a proper showing by the State AG, to issue a preliminary or permanent injunction to restrain a violation. Specifies that a proper showing shall require that a State prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation of State law has taken place or is taking place.Prohibits a preliminary injunction from being granted except upon evidence demonstrating the probability of irreparable injury if injunctive relief is not granted, and upon evidence supporting the probability of success on the merits. Sets forth provisions regarding notice to the adverse party, form and scope of order, admissibility of evidence, rules of construction (regarding extension of jurisdiction of Federal courts in connection with State law), and additional remedies.Specifies that nothing herein may be construed to modify or supersede the Internet Tax Freedom Act.Directs the Attorney General to carry out a study to determine the impact of this Act and submit the results within 180 days after enactment of this Act.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.577 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.577 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.577 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.577 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.