PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act

Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 3, 2021

This bill provides for conservation or transfer of land in Nevada.

Specifically, the bill

transfers approximately 41,055 acres of land to be held in trust for the Moapa Band of Paiutes of the Moapa River Indian Reservation;

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

adjusts the boundary of the Red Rock National Conservation Area to include additional lands;

adjusts the boundary of the Rainbow Gardens Area of Critical Environmental Concern to exclude certain land;

conveys, upon request, certain federal land to a governmental entity in Clark County for any public purpose;

revokes the Ivanpah Area of Critical Environmental Concern;

establishes specified special management areas for conservation purposes;

designates the peak of Frenchman Mountain as the Maude Frazier Mountain;

makes certain funds available for capital improvements in the Tule Springs Fossil Bed National Monument and for implementation of sustainability and climate initiatives in Clark County;

designates additional lands in Nevada as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System;

requires land conveyances to local governments in Nevada for specified public purposes;

makes certain funds available to the city of Mesquite for implementation of a watershed plan for the Lower Virgin River;

expands, and expands eligible uses of, the limited transition area located in the city of Henderson;

establishes off-highway vehicle recreation areas;

conveys to a public water agency in Clark County, upon request, federal land for the construction and operation of critical water conveyance infrastructure for communities serviced by that agency; and

requires completion of the construction of the six erosion control weirs on the lower Las Vegas Wash within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV] · D–NV

Committees

  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.

  2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 117-141.

  3. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  4. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.567 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.567 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.567 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.567 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources