PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 30, 2026

Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026

This bill modifies federal permitting processes, including environmental reviews, to expedite a wide range of projects.

The bill limits the scope of the National Environmental Policy Act and expedites environmental reviews, including by 

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

further limiting the types of federal actions that trigger environmental review,

narrowing the range of alternatives that must be considered in environmental reviews, and

exempting additional types of projects from environmental review.

It also establishes deadlines for issuing permits once an environmental review is complete.

The bill also limits permit obligations under the Clean Water Act, including by

narrowing the scope of review for water quality certifications,

extending the term for permits issued under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, and

limiting the time period for review of permits for discharges of dredged or fill materials.

It also modifies requirements concerning threatened or endangered species to expedite the review of federal permits, including by shortening the timeline for certain consultations.

Additionally, the bill addresses numerous aspects of energy infrastructure permitting, including by 

expanding the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to issue construction permits for certain interstate electricity transmission projects; 

directing FERC to establish ratepayer protections related to certain large computational loads (e.g. data centers); 

removing permit requirements for onshore oil and gas drilling on nonfederal land; and

accelerating renewable energy, geothermal, hydropower, or offshore energy projects.

It also limits the scope of the National Historic Preservation Act, including by limiting what types of projects trigger review.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV] · R–WV

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  2. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Oct 30, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.5653 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.5653 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.5653 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.5653 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources