Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 15, 1995
Derivatives Limitations Act of 1995 - Amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to prohibit an insured depository institution (and any affiliate) from engaging in any transaction involving a derivative financial instrument either for its own account, or that of an affiliate. Permits exceptions for: (1) hedging transactions; (2) a separately capitalized affiliate (not itself an insured depository insitution) of an insured depository institution; and (3) transactions involving de minimis interest in derivative financial instruments sanctioned by a Federal banking regulatory agency. Requires the appropriate Federal banking agency to promulgate rules governing such exceptions. Amends the Federal Credit Union Act to prohibit an insured credit union and any affiliates from engaging in derivative financial instruments transactions. Subjects credit unions and their affiliates to the interstate bank merger provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Amends the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to allow a bank holding company subsidiary to engage in derivative financial instrument transactions for its own account if it: (1) is not an insured depository institution or a subsidiary of one; and (2) is separately capitalized from any affiliated insured depository institution. Subjects bank holding companies to the interstate bank merger provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 21, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.557 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.557 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.557 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.557 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.