Fallen Timbers Battlefield and Fort Miamis National Historic Site Act of 1999
Became Public Law No: 106-164.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 4, 1999
Fallen Timbers Battlefield and Fort Miamis National Historical Site Act - Establishes the Fallen Timbers Battlefield and Fort Miamis National Historical Site in Ohio. Authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to provide technical assistance in the preparation and implementation of the management entity's stewardship plan for the historical site. Prohibits the Secretary, as a condition of the award of technical assistance, to require the award recipient to establish or modify land use restrictions. Prohibits the Secretary or any other Federal agency from making a limitation on fishing, hunting, or trapping a condition of the determination of eligibility for, or receipt of, assistance under this Act.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed without objection. (text: CR 11/19/99 H12843-12844)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.(text: CR 11/19/99 H12843-12844)
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H12842-12844)
Mr. Hansen asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.
Committee on Resources discharged.
Committee on Resources discharged.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S12651-12652)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.(text: CR S12651-12652)
The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12651-12652)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 134.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 106-64.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 106-64.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources requested executive comment from Department of the Interior, OMB.
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Subcommittee on National Parks, Historic Preservation, and Recreation. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 106-113.
Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text of measure as introduced: CR S2331-2332)
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2331)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.548 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.548 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.548 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.548 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.