PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to reinstate the permit for, and extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of, a hydroelectric project in Oregon, and for other purposes.

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 98.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 10, 1995

Directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, upon request of a specified licensee, to reinstate a certain permit effective May 23, 1993, and to extend the period during which the licensee is required to commence project construction to the date that is four years after the date of enactment of this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Hatfield, Mark O. [R-OR] · R–OR

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 98.

    2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 104-75.

    3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported to Senate by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 104-75.

    4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Measure incorporated into measure S. 737 ordered to be reported.

    5. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    6. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources received executive comment from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

    7. Referred to Subcommittee on Energy Production and Regulation.

    8. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

    9. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3810-3811)

    10. Introduced in Senate

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze S.538 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine S.538 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine S.538 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine S.538 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources