PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion by Senator McConnell to reconsider the vote by which cloture was not invoked on the motion to proceed to S. 534 (Record Vote. No. 63) entered in Senate.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 23, 2015
Immigration Rule of Law Act of 2015
This bill prohibits the use of any funds made available to the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) or to any other federal official, including deposits into the Immigration Examinations Fee Account, to carry out any of the policy changes set forth in the following memoranda dated either November 20 or November 21, 2014 (or any substantially similar policy changes issued or taken on or after January 9, 2015):
Southern Border and Approaches Campaign;
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Policies for the Apprehension, Detention and Removal of Undocumented Immigrants;
Secure Communities;
Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children and with Respect to Certain Individuals Who Are the Parents of U.S. Citizens or Permanent Residents;
Expansion of the Provisional Waiver Program;
Policies Supporting U.S. High-Skilled Businesses and Workers;
Families of U.S. Armed Forces Members and Enlistees;
Directive to Provide Consistency Regarding Advance Parole;
Policies to Promote and Increase Access to U.S. Citizenship;
Modernizing and Streamlining the U.S. Immigrant Visa System for the 21st Century; and
Creating Welcoming Communities and Fully Integrating Immigrants and Refugees.
Such memoranda or substantially similar policy changes are declared to have no statutory or constitutional basis and therefore no legal effect.
No funds or fees made available to the Secretary or to any federal official may be used to grant any federal benefit to any alien pursuant to any of such policy changes.
No funds or fees made available to the Secretary may be used to carry out any policy relating to the apprehension, detention, or removal of aliens that does not treat any alien convicted of any offense involving domestic violence, sexual abuse, child molestation, or child exploitation as within the categories of aliens subject to the highest DHS civil immigration enforcement priorities.
It is the sense of Congress that:
disparate employer/employee health insurance requirements discourage the hiring of U.S. citizens and those in lawful immigration status; and
the Executive Branch should refrain from pursuing policies such as granting to unlawfully present individuals any deferred action under the deferred action for childhood arrivals program and work authorization.
It is the sense of Congress that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service should:
stop putting the interests of aliens who are unlawfully present in the United States ahead of the interests of aliens who are following proper immigration laws and procedures by taking specified actions, and
use the funds available under existing law to improve services and increase the efficiency of the immigration benefits application process for aliens abroad or who are lawfully present in the United States.
People & committees
Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME] · R–ME
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion by Senator McConnell to reconsider the vote by which cloture was not invoked on the motion to proceed to S. 534 (Record Vote. No. 63) entered in Senate.
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 57 - 42. Record Vote Number: 63. (consideration: CR S1192; text CR S1192)
Senate roll call 63 · Individual votesCloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (consideration: CR S1152; text: CR S1152)
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (consideration: CR S1152)
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 22.
Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 12, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.534 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.534 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.534 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.534 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.