PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

National Laboratories Partnership Improvement Act of 2001

Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 65.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 12, 2001

National Laboratories Partnership Improvement Act of 2001 - Instructs the Secretary of Energy to: (1) establish a Technology Infrastructure Pilot Program to improve the ability of the National Laboratories to support department missions; (2) provide specified maximum funding among up to ten National Laboratories selected to conduct those Programs; and (3) require the Director of each National Laboratory to establish a small business advocacy and assistance program, including a technology partnership ombudsman.Requires the Secretary to direct the Laboratory Operations Board to conduct studies related to improving mission effectiveness, partnerships, and technology transfer at National Laboratories.Amends the Department of Energy Organization Act to authorize the Secretary to enter into transactions with public and private entities for research projects.Mandates that, with respect to National Laboratories and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) facilities, all actions taken by the Secretary in implementing this Act shall be through the Administrator for Nuclear Security in conformance with the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000.Amends the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 to reflect the provisions of this Act with respect to strategic plans, experimental Federal waivers, and time required for approval.Requires the Director of NNSA to obligate funds in certain percentage amounts each fiscal year for cooperative research and development agreements, or similar cooperative, cost-shared research partnerships with non-Federal organizations.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Bingaman, Jeff [D-NM] · D–NM

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 65.

  2. Senate passed related measure H.R.4 in lieu of this measure by Yea-Nay Vote. 88 - 11. Record Vote Number: 94.

    Senate roll call 94 · Individual votes
  3. Senate incorporated this measure in H.R.4 as an amendment.

  4. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3342-3417)

  5. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3233-3293)

  6. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3117-3142, S3145-3150)

  7. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3009-3011)

  8. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2871-2906, S2911-2916, S2936)

  9. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2763-2820, S2857-2869)

  10. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2696-2717)

  11. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2507-2516, S2556-2571)

  12. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2425-2443, S2447-2451, S2452-2465)

  13. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2389-2402)

  14. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2345-2347, S2351-2352)

  15. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2194-2219, S2221-2222, S2223-2229, S2231-2239)

  16. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2161-2174)

  17. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2018-2069)

  18. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1961-1962)

  19. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1871-1915)

  20. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1805-1840, S1841-1850)

  21. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1743-1775)

  22. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1715-1726)

  23. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1693-1694)

  24. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1621-1658)

  25. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1553-1562, S1567-1592)

  26. Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1431-1438, S1441-1527, S1530-1533)

  27. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S884-888)

  28. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 65.

  29. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 107-30.

  30. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Murkowski without amendment. With written report No. 107-30.

  31. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  32. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  33. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.517 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.517 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.517 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.517 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources