PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Yosemite Emergency Restoration and Construction Act of 1997

Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 20, 1997

Yosemite Emergency Restoration and Construction Act of 1997 - Authorizes appropriations for FY 1997 for use by the Secretary of the Interior for cleanup and repair of flood damage to the facilities of Yosemite National Park and other national parks in California (including Redwood, Sequoia-Kings Canyon, and Lassen Volcanic National Parks, Devils Postpile and Lava Beds National Monuments, and Whiskeytown National Recreation Area) caused by heavy rains and flooding in December 1996 and January 1997. Authorizes appropriations for FY 1998 for the establishment of a mass transit system at Yosemite. Earmarks amounts to be used for the purchase of electric buses and alternative-fueled buses.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA] · D–CA

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to Subcommittee on Parks, Preservation and Recreation.

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2672-2673)

  4. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.500 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.500 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.500 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.500 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources