PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

A bill to reauthorize appropriations for the New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail Route, and for other purposes.

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 57.

Official summary

Version 01 · Reported to Senate with amendment(s) · Mar 17, 2005

Revises provisions regarding the authorization of appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in New Jersey. Provides for the use of funds made available under this Act only for technical assistance and the design and fabrication of interpretive materials, devices, and signs. Prohibits the use of such funds for operation, repair, or construction costs, except for the costs of constructing interpretive exhibits. Limits the Federal share of any project carried out with funds made available under this Act to 50 percent of the total projected costs and requires the Federal share to be provided on a matching basis. Terminates the authorities provided to the Secretary of the Interior under this Act on September 30, 2007.

Requires the Secretary to prepare a strategic plan that describes opportunities to increase participation in the planning, development, and administration of the route and organizational options for sustaining the route.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Lautenberg, Frank R. [D-NJ] · D–NJ

Committees

  • Energy and Natural Resources Committee
2 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 57.

  2. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici with amendments. With written report No. 109-41.

  3. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Domenici with amendments. With written report No. 109-41.

  4. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably.

  5. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text of measure as introduced: CR S235)

  6. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S235)

  7. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.48 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.48 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.48 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.48 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources