PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Aug 3, 2022
Malheur Community Empowerment for the Owyhee Act
This bill addresses various public land concerns in Malheur County in Oregon.
The bill directs the Department of the Interior to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement for certain federal land in the county. Interior shall develop plans for areas that are ecologically degraded or most at risk of being ecologically degraded. Interior shall establish the Malheur Community Empowerment for Owyhee Group, which shall, among other things, use such statement to review projects proposed to the Bureau of Land Management by group members, ranchers holding grazing permits on the federal land, or other members of the public.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
The bill also
establishes a network to monitor such land,
designates 1,133,481 acres of federal lands in the county as wilderness and components of the National Wilderness Preservation System,
designates a 14.7-mile segment of Owyhee River as a recreational river,
establishes improvements for certain loop roads,
requires separate feasibility studies concerning Owyhee Reservoir,
requires improvements to existing Oregon State Parks and private camps on the shore of the Reservoir,
establishes a dude ranch at Birch Creek,
requires a feasibility study on a specified rails-to-trails project,
requires a feasibility study on marketing communities or portions of the county as the Gateway to the Oregon Owyhee,
requires a determination of the use and conditions under which the Jordan Valley Airstrip may be used to support firefighting,
establishes the Native Seed Center as the primary federal native seed repository in the Western States, and
requires that land be taken into trust for the benefit of the Burns Paiute Tribe.
People & committees
Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR] · D–OR
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.4752 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.4752 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.4752 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.4752 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.