PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Vietnam Women's Memorial Coin Act of 1994

Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance.

Official summary

Version 35 · Passed Senate amended · Nov 24, 1993

Vietnam Women's Memorial Coin Act of 1994 - Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to issue silver coins emblematic of the Vietnam Women's Memorial sculpture. Restricts the issuance of such coins to the period beginning on May 1, 1994, and ending on May 1, 1995. Requires all surcharges received from the sale of such coins to be used for: (1) an endowment for the Memorial; (2) education and research concerning veterans and their families; and (3) the identification and documentation of women who served in the armed forces during the Vietnam era. Expresses the sense of the Congress that this coin program shall be self-sustaining and administered to result in no net cost to the Numismatic Public Enterprise Fund.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Warner, John [R-VA] · R–VA

Committees

  • Financial Services Committee
  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
59 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance.

  2. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  3. Referred to the House Committee on Banking, Finance + Urban Affrs.

  4. Received in the House.

  5. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  6. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

  7. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S17230-17231)

  8. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 233.

  9. Committee on Banking. Reported to Senate by Senator Riegle without amendment. Without written report.

  10. Committee on Banking. Reported to Senate by Senator Riegle without amendment. Without written report.

  11. Committee on Banking. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  12. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking.

  13. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2209-2210)

  14. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.469 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.469 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.469 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.469 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources