Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act of 2005 - Amends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 to extend the terrorism risk insurance program from 2005 through 2007.
Raises the property and casualty insurance loss threshold that qualifies for certification by the Secretary of the Treasury as an act of terrorism with respect to Program Year 4 and Program Year 5.
Defines Program Year 5 as ending on December 31, 2007.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Read full official summaryShow less
Excludes from covered lines of insurance: (1) commercial automobile insurance; (2) burglary and theft insurance; (3) surety insurance; (4) professional liability insurance; and (5) farm owners multiple peril insurance.
Prescribes formulae for insurer deductibles for Program Years 4 and 5.
Sets the federal share of insured loss compensation for Program Year 5 at 85% (Year 4 is currently 90%) of the amount of insured losses exceeding the applicable insurer deductible.
Specifies for Program Years 4 and 5 increasing maximum aggregate retention amounts in the formula for mandatory recoupment of the federal share of insured loss compensation paid.
States that procedures and requirements for advance approval of settlements established by the Secretary are applicable to any cause of action for damages in connection with a determination by the Secretary that an act of terrorism has occurred.
Directs the President's Working Group on Financial Markets to analyze and report to certain congressional committees on the long-term availability and affordability of insurance for terrorism risk, including: (1) group life coverage; and (2) coverage for chemical, nuclear, biological, and radiological events.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendment Agreed to by voice vote. (text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H12136)
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendment Agreed to by voice vote.(text as House agreed to Senate amendment: CR H12136)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on the motion to suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendment to S. 467.
Mr. Oxley moved that the House suspend the rules and agree to the Senate amendment to the House amendment. (consideration: CR H12135-12141)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Senate concurred in House amendment with an amendment (SA 2689) Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S13931-13934; text as Senate agreed to House amendment with amendment: CR S13933)
Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate concurred in House amendment with an amendment (SA 2689) Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S13931-13934; text as Senate agreed to House amendment with amendment: CR S13933)
Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
The Speaker appointed a conferee for consideration of the Senate bill and the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Sessions.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on the Judiciary for consideration of secs. 2 and 6 of the Senate bill and modifications committed to conference: Sensenbrenner, Goodlatte, and Conyers.
The Speaker appointed conferees Provided that Mr. Israel is appointed in lieu of Mr. Capuano for consideration of secs. 4, 5, and 7 of the Senate bill, and secs. 103 and 105 of the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference.
The Speaker appointed conferees - from the Committee on Financial Services for consideration of the Senate bill and the House amendment, and modifications committed to conference: Oxley, Baker, Pryce (OH), Kelly, Kanjorski, Capuano, and Crowley.
On motion that the House insist upon its amendment, and request a conference Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Oxley moved that the House insist upon its amendment, and request a conference.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 371 - 49 (Roll no. 612). (text: CR H11130-11135)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 371 - 49 (Roll no. 612).(text: CR H11130-11135)
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H11147)
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 467.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H11130-11141)
Mr. Oxley moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
Held at the desk.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR 11/17/2005 S13277-13282; text of measure as reported in Senate: CR 11/17/2005 S13277-13278)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 287.
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Shelby with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Reported by Senator Shelby with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S9424)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text of measure as introduced: CR S1723-1724)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Mar 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.467 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.467 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.467 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.467 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.