A bill to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to improve the enforcement capabilities of the Federal Election Commission, and for other purposes.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 14, 1997
Amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA) to authorize the Federal Election Commission (Commission) to issue a regulation to require the filing of designations, statements, and reports using computers if the person has, or has reason to expect to have, aggregate contributions or expenditures in excess of a threshold amount determined by the Commission. Requires the Commission to prescribe a regulation allowing persons to file designations, statements, and reports using facsimile machines. (Sec. 3) Authorizes the Commission to conduct random audits and investigations to ensure voluntary compliance. Extends the period during which a campaign audit of a candidate's authorized committee may be begun. (Sec. 4) Grants authority to the Commission to seek at any time in a proceeding a temporary restraining order or a temporary injunction if the Commission believes there is a substantial likelihood that a violation is occurring or is about to occur. (Sec. 5) Revises the requirement regarding the payment of a civil penalty for knowing and willful violations of any contribution or expenditure to authorize, under a conciliation agreement entered into by the Commission, the payment of a civil penalty not exceeding the greater of $15,000 or an amount equal to 300 percent (currently the greater of $10,000 or an amount equal to 200 percent). (Sec. 6) Sets forth the following with respect to civil penalties for minor reporting violations. Directs the Commission by regulation to: (1) establish a definition of the term "minor reporting violation"; and (2) establish a schedule of the amounts (or ranges of the amounts) of civil penalties (not to exceed $5,000 or an amount equal to the amount of any contribution or expenditure involved in the violation) to be assessed for different categories of minor reporting violations. Prohibits the Commission from assessing a civil penalty within 30 days before the date of an election. Permits the Commission to seek enforcement of a civil action in U.S. district court. (Sec. 7) Repeals requirements for the filing of designations, statements, and reports required under FECA by a Senate candidate and the candidate's principal campaign committee with the Secretary of the Senate. Replaces them with a requirement for all such designations, statements, and reports to be filed with the Commission. (Sec. 8) Revises FECA authorization of appropriations provisions to, among other things: (1) add an additional amount for FY 1997 to be used to investigate the extraordinary problems associated with the 1996 elections; and (2) authorize appropriations for FY 1998.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze S.446 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine S.446 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine S.446 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine S.446 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.