PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Waste Tire Recycling, Abatement, and Disposal Act of 1997

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3382)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Mar 14, 1997

Waste Tire Recycling, Abatement, and Disposal Act of 1997 - Amends the Solid Waste Disposal Act to prohibit, with exceptions, the following: (1) disposal of a waste tire (other than shredded tire material) on land or in a landfill; (2) receipt of any waste tire at any collection site unless, within seven days after receipt, it is processed, converted to shredded tire material, or transferred to a tire retreading business; (3) operation of a collection site except in compliance with stated standards (and others required by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule) concerning such matters as size, location, accessibility, enclosure, and emergency planning; (4) storage of more than 1,500 waste tires, other than as shredded tire material, for more than seven days at a collection site; (5) engaging in certain waste tire transfer, disposal, or delivery activities except in compliance with a permit issued pursuant to a State waste tire recycling, abatement, and disposal program (State program) approved under this Act or by the EPA Administrator; and (6) operation of a shredded tire facility containing more than a specified amount of material. Requires tire haulers, collectors, and processors to file with the Administrator or the designated State agency, within one year of enactment of this Act, reports containing specified information on waste tire presence, delivery, and site operation. Provides procedures for application for approval to implement a State program. Directs the Administrator to establish minimum elements of a program that include permit, fee, and revenue use requirements. Requires a report to the Congress based on State application information. Authorizes grants to States from the Waste Tire Recycling, Abatement, and Disposal Trust Fund and other assistance on a cost recovery basis. Requires the Administrator to establish, administer, and enforce a program for a State if it has not submitted a program for approval or is not adequately administering and enforcing a program. Authorizes the Administrator to: (1) order an owner or operator of a collection site or a transferor of waste tires to a site to abate the site and to undertake abatement action using the Trust Fund; and (2) bring an action to restrain the operation of, or deposit of tires at, the site or take other action to protect human health and the environment, including issuing orders as necessary if this action is insufficient. Imposes penalties for violations of orders and liability for costs incurred in an abatement action undertaken by the Administrator. Directs the Secretary of the Interior, the Administrator of the General Services Administration, and the head of each Federal agency that owns land on which a tire collection site is located to prepare a plan to abate, not later than December 31, 2002, waste tire dumps and stockpiles located on public lands. Authorizes appropriations from the Trust Fund. Makes Trust Fund amounts available for: (1) grants to develop and implement State programs (giving highest priority to ensuring adequate capacity for tire shredding operations); (2) abatement on public lands; (3) cost offsets associated with Federal procurement of asphalt paving material containing recycled rubber; (4) Federal abatement program implementation or Federal abatement actions; and (5) waste tire processing research and development. Directs the Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Transportation, to conduct a program of research regarding such asphalt material. Sets forth procedures for issuance of compliance orders and imposition of civil and criminal penalties. Requires the Administrator to prepare final guidelines, not later than December 31, 1999, for rubber products containing crumb rubber derived from waste tire processing.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Chafee, John H. [R-RI] · R–RI

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3382)

  2. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  3. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2324-2325, S2329-2330)

  4. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.445 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.445 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.445 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.445 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources