PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Katimiîn and Ameekyáaraam Sacred Lands Act

Became Public Law No: 117-353.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jan 5, 2023

Katimiîn and Ameekyáaraam Sacred Lands Act

This act takes approximately 1,031 acres of specified lands in Siskiyou and Humboldt Counties, California, into trust for the benefit of the Karuk Tribe. Land taken into trust may be used for traditional and customary uses for the benefit of the tribe.

Additionally, the land taken into trust must allow for continued access by the Forest Service for managing the component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System that flows through the land. The Department of Agriculture must enter into a memorandum of understanding with the tribe to establish mutual goals for the protection and enhancement of the river values of such component.

Further, the act prohibits gaming on the land taken into trust.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA] · D–CA

Committees

  • Indian Affairs Committee
1 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Became Public Law No: 117-353.

  2. Became Public Law No: 117-353.

  3. Signed by President.

  4. Signed by President.

  5. Presented to President.

  6. Presented to President.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H10009)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H10009)

  10. DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on S. 4439.

  11. Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H10009-10010)

  12. Mr. Tonko moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

  13. Held at the desk.

  14. Received in the House.

  15. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  16. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9726; text: CR S9726)

  17. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9726; text: CR S9726)

  18. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  19. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.

  20. Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

  21. Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 117-530.

  22. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S3077)

  23. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Dec 10, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.4439 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.4439 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.4439 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.4439 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources