PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 25, 1993
Federal Efficiency Improvement Act of 1993 - Requires the President to appoint a Special Assistant (SA) for the Improvement of Federal Efficiency to serve within the Executive Office of the President. Requires the SA to conduct a Federal performance audit and review (FPAR) and report to the President and the Congress on: (1) ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Federal programs or activities. Requires the SA to: (1) propose savings by restructuring incentives to motivate Federal employees; (2) propose actions to improve the efficiency and quality of services delivered and restructure Government organization to provide for long-term efficiency and savings; (3) establish a special team to study Government-wide issues such as procurement and personnel; (4) establish a telephone line for public comment and hold regional public meetings to increase public input; and (5) study ways to improve the effectiveness and to increase the independence of Inspectors General in executive agencies. Requires the President to submit any budget authority rescissions necessary to implement FPAR recommendations.
People & committees
Sen. Krueger, Robert C. [D-TX] · D–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Committee on Governmental Affairs. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2090-2091)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.436 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.436 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.436 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.436 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.