PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2851-2853)
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 24, 1993
Civil Aircraft Trade Enforcement Act of 1993 - Directs the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to collect information on: (1) subsidies provided by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom to Airbus Industrie member companies with respect to the manufacture and exportation of large civil aircraft to the United States; and (2) whether the U.S. large civil aircraft manufacturing industry is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of such imports. Requires the administering authority to initiate a countervailing duty investigation under the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to such imports.
People & committees
Sen. Danforth, John C. [R-MO] · R–MO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2851-2853)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2005)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Aug 26, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.418 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.418 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.418 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.418 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.