PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

Asset Conservation, Lender Liability, and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1995

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 10, 1995

Asset Conservation, Lender Liability, and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1995 - Amends the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to absolve Federal banking or lending agencies of liability under any law imposing strict liability for the release of hazardous substances (including petroleum) from property acquired in connection with: (1) receivership or conservatorship authority or the liquidation of an insured depository institution; (2) the provision of loans or other financial assistance; or (3) property received in a civil or criminal proceeding or administrative enforcement action. Extends such immunity to the first subsequent purchaser of property acquired from such an agency, except under certain conditions. Provides that such an agency that causes or contributes to a release may be liable for response actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or Superfund) or under Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (provisions pertaining to underground storage tanks). Exempts such agencies from any law requiring them to grant covenants warranting that a response action has been, or will be, taken with respect to such acquired property. Amends CERCLA to limit liability under such Act and Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of insured depository institutions or other lenders in connection with property acquired through foreclosure, subject to a security interest, held by a lessor pursuant to an extension of credit, or subject to financial control pursuant to an extension of credit, to the actual benefit conferred on the institution or lender by a removal, remedial, corrective, or other response action undertaken by another party. Defines the "actual benefit" as the net gain realized by the institution or lender due to such action. Provides that institutions or lenders that caused or contributed to hazardous substance releases may be liable for response actions. Directs the Administrator to issue guidelines for such institutions and lenders to develop procedures to evaluate environmental risks that may arise from or at property prior to making an extension of credit secured by such property. Provides that the liability of a fiduciary that is liable under other CERCLA provisions or Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act for releases in connection with property held in a fiduciary capacity may not exceed the assets held in such capacity that are available to indemnify the fiduciary. Makes fiduciaries potentially liable for response or corrective actions if they caused or contributed to a hazardous substance release. Lists additional conditions under which fiduciaries are exempted from liability. Makes liability provisions regarding fiduciaries inapplicable to Federal banking or lending agencies. Excludes from the definition of "owner or operator," for purposes of limiting liability under CERCLA, the United States, a Federal agency, or a conservator or receiver appointed by a Federal agency which acquired ownership of a facility or vessel in connection with receivership or conservatorship, forfeiture or seizure authority, or pursuant to a law specifying the property to be acquired, provided such entity does not participate in operations that result in a release. Excludes persons who did not participate in management of a vessel or facility prior to foreclosure (even if they engage in specified foreclosure, business, or response activities) from such definition as well. Includes underground storage tanks in the definition of "facility or vessel." Makes conforming amendments to the Solid Waste Disposal Act with respect to limitations on liability established by this Act.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. D'Amato, Alfonse [R-NY] · R–NY

Committees

  • Environment and Public Works Committee
3 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

  2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S2528-2529)

  3. Introduced in Senate

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze S.394 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine S.394 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine S.394 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine S.394 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources