PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.

National Security Surveillance Act of 2006

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 599.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Sep 7, 2006

National Security Surveillance Act of 2006 - Amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (the Act) to establish a new title relating to electronic surveillance. Gives the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Court) (established under the Act) jurisdiction to review U.S. electronic surveillance programs (programs) that seek to obtain foreign intelligence information or to protect against international terrorism. Allows the Court to issue an order that authorizes a program for up to 90 days. Provides for congressional oversight of approved programs.

Prohibits any provision of the Act from being construed to limit the constitutional authority of the President to collect intelligence with respect to foreign powers and agents thereof.

Revises generally provisions of the Act concerning electronic surveillance authorizations obtained without a court order, including certification by the Attorney General, reports to congressional committees, duties and compensation of common carriers required to perform, or make equipment available for, such surveillance, and application requirements.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Sen. Specter, Arlen [R-PA] · R–PA

Committees

    0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

      Actions

      A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

      1. Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 599.

      2. Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

      3. Introduced in Senate

      Bill text & related measures

      Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

      Related bills identified by Congress.gov

      Source last updated: Jan 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

      Explore the bill from different angles

      Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

      Neutral evidence review

      Objective

      Analyze S.3876 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

      View full prompt & sources
      Fairness and public impact

      Progressive lens

      Examine S.3876 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

      View full prompt & sources
      Institutions and government scope

      Conservative lens

      Examine S.3876 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

      View full prompt & sources
      Individual rights and government power

      Liberty lens

      Examine S.3876 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

      View full prompt & sources