PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Voice Vote.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in Senate · Feb 17, 1993
Emergency Unemployment Compensation Amendments of 1993 - Amends the Emergency Unemployment Compensation Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-164, as amended) to extend the authorization for new claims for benefits under the emergency unemployment compensation (EUC program) to October 2, 1993 (currently March 6, 1993). Modifies the final phase-out period for continuation of claims to end on January 15, 1994 (currently June 19, 1993). Provides for a similar extension of the program of temporary extended railroad unemployment insurance benefits (and modification of the phase-out period). Directs the Secretary of Labor to establish a program to encourage all States to adopt and implement a system (including automated data processing) for profiling all new claimants for regular unemployment compensation, to determine which claimants may be likely to exhaust such compensation and need reemployment assistance services. Requires provision of such technical assistance, advice, and funding to States for model profiling systems as the Secretary deems appropriate and necessary. Requires the Secretary to report, with recommendations, to the Congress on such systems within 30 months after enactment of this Act. Authorizes appropriations to carry out this Act's extension of the EUC program. Designates all direct spending amounts provided and all appropriations authorized by this Act as emergency requirements for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act).
People & committees
Sen. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick [D-NY] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Voice Vote.
Senate incorporated this measure in H.R. 920 as an amendment.
Senate passed companion measure H.R. 920 in lieu of this measure by Yea-Nay Vote. 66-33. Record Vote No: 24.
Senate roll call 24 · Individual votesConsidered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2262-2275, S2278-2279, S2281, S2284-2304)
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2190-2206)
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 7.
Committee on Finance. Reported to Senate by Senator Moynihan with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Finance. Reported to Senate by Senator Moynihan with amendments. Without written report.
Committee on Finance. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
Committee on Finance. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 103-81.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S1739-1740)
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.382 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.382 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.382 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.382 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.