PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 523.
Congressional Research Service
Version 25 · Reported to Senate · Jul 27, 2026
Consumer Labeling for Enhanced API Reporting and Legitimate Accountability for Base Entity Listings Act or the CLEAR LABELS Act
This bill requires drugs and active pharmaceutical ingredients made available in the U.S. market to be labeled with the names and locations of their manufacturers.
Specifically, a finished, packaged drug product must be labeled with the name and place of business of (1) the original manufacturer (or manufacturers) of each active pharmaceutical ingredient; (2) the original manufacturer of the finished drug product; and (3) the packer or distributor, if any. This information must be printed on the product label or made available electronically. Active pharmaceutical ingredients (which are generally sold to manufacturers and researchers, not consumers) must also be labeled with the name and place of business of their original manufacturers.
Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.
Under the bill, the original manufacturer is the establishment that conducts the majority of the significant phases of manufacturing to produce the ingredient or product.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has discretion to determine whether a violation of these requirements constitutes misbranding and to assess a civil fine. The FDA must consider certain factors in determining whether to assess a fine, including whether the violator was notified of their noncompliance and was provided an opportunity to correct the violation.
Finally, the FDA must coordinate with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to address any overlap between these requirements and existing requirements for imported drugs.
These provisions take effect five years after the bill is enacted.
People & committees
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 523.
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Cassidy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Reported by Senator Cassidy with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Introduced in Senate
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Sep 8, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze S.3788 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine S.3788 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine S.3788 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine S.3788 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.